Natives and aliens: Who and what belongs in nature and in the nation?
Corresponding Author
Marco Antonsich
Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Correspondence
Marco Antonsich
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Marco Antonsich
Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Correspondence
Marco Antonsich
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The distinction between native and alien species is a main tenet of various natural sciences, invasion biology in particular. However, it is also a contested one, as it does not reflect the biological features of a species, but only its place of origin and migration history. The present paper offers a brief genealogy of the native/alien divide and argues that central to this binary is a national thinking that divides the world into distinct (national) units, enclosed by (natural) borders, with a unique (native) population attached to these spatial units. The paper illustrates this argument by looking at two interrelated processes: the nationalisation of nature, by which the national thinking intervenes as an organising principle in determining ecological inclusion/exclusion, and the naturalisation of the nation, through which the nation is given an ontological status. Taken together these two processes confirm the continuing salience of the nation as a b-ordering principle actively constituting both the social and natural world, also in times of anthropogenic changes and increasing people’s mobility.
Abstract
The paper offers a brief genealogy of the native/alien divide, both in the natural and social realm, and argues that central to this binary is a national thinking that divides the world into distinct (national) units, enclosed by (natural) borders, with a unique (native) population. It looks at two interrelated processes: the nationalisation of nature, by which the national thinking intervenes as an organising principle in determining ecological inclusion/exclusion, and the naturalisation of the nation, through which the nation is given an ontological status. Taken together, these two processes confirm the continuing salience of the nation as a b-ordering principle actively constituting both the social and natural world, also in times of anthropogenic changes and increasing people’s mobility.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this paper as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
REFERENCES
- Alba, R., & Foner, N. (2014). Comparing Immigrant Integration in North America and Western Europe: How Much Do the Grand Narratives Tell Us? International Migration Review, 48, S263–S291.
- Anderson, B., Sharma, N., & Wright, C. (2009). Why no borders? Refuge, 26, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.32074
10.25071/1920-7336.32074 Google Scholar
- Antonsich, M. (2005). Cardinal markers of Finland's identity politics and national identity. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 46, 289–304. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.46.4.290
- Antonsich, M. (2016). The neoliberal culturalist nation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12132
- Antonsich, M., & Matejskova, T. (2015). Immigration societies and the question of ‘the national’. Ethnicities, 15, 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796815577705
- Balibar, E. (1990). The nation form. Review, 13, 329–361.
- Barcena, I., Ibarra, P., & Zubiaga, M. (1997). The evolution of the relationship between ecologism and nationalism. In M. Redclift, & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 300–315). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
10.4337/9781843768593.00030 Google Scholar
- Baskin, Y. (2013). A plague of rats and rubbervines. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Bassin, M. (1987). Race contra space: The conflict between German Geopolitik and National Socialism. Political Geography Quarterly, 6, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-9827(87)90002-4
- Bassin, M. (2005). Blood or soil? The Völkisch movement, the Nazis, and the legacy of Geopolitik. In F.-J. Brüggemeier, M. Cioc, & T. Zeller (Eds.), How green were the Nazis? (pp. 204–242). Athens, Greece: Ohio University Press.
- Bassin, M. (2009). Nurture is nature: Lev Gumilev and the ecology of ethnicity. Slavic Review, 68, 872–897. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900024566
- Bassin, M. (2015). Lev Gumilev and the European New Right. Nationalities Papers, 43, 840–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1057560
- Beck, U., & Levy, D. (2013). Cosmopolitanized nations. Theory, Culture and Society, 30, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412457223
- Bhatia, R. (2004). Green or brown. In A. L. Ferber (Ed.), Home-grown hate (pp. 194–214). London, UK: Routledge.
- Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J. T., Duncan, R. P., Jarošík, V., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M. (2011). A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
- Brüggemeier, F.-J., Cioc, M., & Zeller, T. (2005). Introduction. In F.-J. Brüggemeier, M. Cioc, & T. Zeller (Eds.), How green were the Nazis? (pp. 1–17). Athens, Greece: Ohio University Press.
- Castree, N. (2014). Making sense of nature. London, UK: Routledge.
- Chew, M. (2011). Anekeitaxonomy: Botany, place and belonging. In I. D. Rotherham & R. A. Lambert (Eds.), Invasive and Introduced Plants and Animals (pp. 137–151). London, UK: Earthscan.
- Chew, M. K., & Hamilton, A. L. (2011). The rise and fall of biotic nativeness: A historical perspective. Fifty years of invasion ecology (pp. 35–48). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Clifford, J. (1997). Routes. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
- Colautti, R. I., & MacIsaac, H. J. (2004). A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’species. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x
- Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, L. (2001). Naturing the nation: Aliens, apocalypse and the postcolonial state. Journal of Southern African Studies, 27, 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430120074626
- Crang, M., & Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2010). Nation, race, and affect. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2315–2331. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4346
- Cresswell, T. (1996). In place, out of place. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The “anthropocene”. In E. Ehlers, & T. Krafft (Eds.), Earth system science in the anthropocene (pp. 13–18). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3 Google Scholar
- Davis, M. A., Chew, M. K., Hobbs, R. J., Lugo, A. E., Ewel, J. J., Vermeij, G. J., Brown, J. H., Rosenzweig, M. L., Gardener, M. R., Carroll, S. P., Thompson, K., Pickett, S. T. A., Stromberg, J. C., Tredici, P. D.., … Thompson, K. (2011). Don't judge species on their origins. Nature, 474, 153. https://doi.org/10.1038/474153a
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
- Dobson, A., Barker, K., & Taylor, S. (2013). Biosecurity. London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203113110 Google Scholar
- Domisch, S., Jähnig, S. C., & Haase, P. (2011). Climate-change winners and losers. Freshwater Biology, 56, 2009–2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02631.x
- Eggel, D., Liebich, A., & Mancini-Griffoli, D. (2007). Was Herder a nationalist? Review of Politics, 69, 48–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670507000319
10.1017/S0034670507000319 Google Scholar
- Elton, C. S. (2000). The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London, UK: Methuen & Co.
- Essl, F., Bacher, S., Genovesi, P., Hulme, P. E., Jeschke, J. M., Katsanevakis, S., Kowarik, I., Kühn, I., Pyšek, P., & Rabitsch, W. (2018). Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. BioScience, 68, 496–509.
- Falk-Petersen, J., Bøhn, T., & Sandlund, O. T. (2006). On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biological Invasions, 8, 1409–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-0710-6
- Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10, 199–224. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100204
- Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Gibbs, L., Atchison, J., & Macfarlane, I. (2015). Camel country: Assemblage, belonging and scale in invasive species geographies. Geoforum, 58, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.013
- Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic. London, UK: Verso.
- Gould, S. J. (1998). An evolutionary perspective on strengths, fallacies, and confusions in the concept of native plants. Arnoldia, 58, 3–10.
- Green, P. (2002). Riparian alien plants-towards ecological acceptance. ECOS, 23, 34–42.
- Gröning, G., & Wolschke-Bulmahn, J. (2004). The native plant enthusiasm: Ecological panacea or xenophobia? Arnoldia, 62, 20–28.
- Hage, G. (2000). White nation. London, UK: Routledge.
- Hall, M. (2003). The Native, Naturalized and Exotic – Plants and animals in human history. Landscape Research, 28, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142639032000042734
10.1080/01426390306534 Google Scholar
- Hall, S. (1995). New cultures for old. In D. Massey, & P. Jess (Eds.), A place in the world? (pp. 175–211). Oxford, UK: Open University/Oxford University.
- Head, L., & Muir, P. (2004). Nativeness, invasiveness, and nation in Australian plants. Geographical Review, 94, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00167.x
- Hettinger, N. (2001). Exotic species, naturalisation, and biological nativism. Environmental Values, 10, 193–224. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340804
- Hill, A. P., & Hadly, E. A. (2018). Rethinking “Native” in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00096
- Jensen, J. (1937). Die “Lichtung”. Die Gartenkunst, 50, 177–180.
- Jones, O. (2009). Nature-culture. In R. Kitchin, & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 309–323). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00716-1 Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, E. (1998). “Naturalizing the nation”: The rise of naturalistic nationalism in the United States and Canada. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40, 666–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417598001698
- Kaufmann, E., & Zimmer, O. (1998). In search of the authentic nation. Nations and Nationalism, 4, 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00483.x
10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00483.x Google Scholar
- Kohn, H. (1950). Romanticism and the rise of German nationalism. Review of Politics, 12, 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500047148
10.1017/S0034670500047148 Google Scholar
- Kull, C. A. (2018). Critical invasion science: Weeds, pests, and aliens Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography (pp. 249–272). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Lawton, G. (2019). The rise of real eco-fascism. New Scientist, 17 August, 24.
10.1016/S0262-4079(19)31529-5 Google Scholar
- Lövei, G. L. (1997). Biodiversity: Global change through invasion. Nature, 388, 627–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/41665
- Malkki, L. (1992). National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030
- Martin, R. J., & Trigger, D. (2015). Negotiating belonging: Plants, people, and indigeneity in northern Australia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21, 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12206
- McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999). Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1
- Miller, M. (2019). Biocultural nationalism? Bananas and biosecurity in Northern Queensland. Australian Geographer, 50, 349–364, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2019.1591327
- Modood, T. (2019). A multicultural nationalism? Brown Journal of World Affairs, 25, 233–246.
- Mosse, G. L. (1964). The crisis of German ideology. New York, NY: Schocken.
- Mosse, G. L. (1995). Racism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 1, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1995.00163.x
10.1111/j.1354-5078.1995.00163.x Google Scholar
- O’Brien, W. (2006). Exotic invasions, nativism, and ecological restoration: On the persistence of a contentious debate. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790500512530
10.1080/13668790500512530 Google Scholar
- Olden, J. D., Poff, N. L., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E., & Fausch, K. D. (2004). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010
- Olsen, J. (1999). Nature and nationalism. New York, NY: St Martin's.
- Olwig, K. R. (2003). Natives and aliens in the national landscape. Landscape Research, 28, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390306525
10.1080/01426390306525 Google Scholar
- Peretti, J. H. (1998). Nativism and nature: Rethinking biological invasion. Environmental Values, 7, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327198129341537
- Pereyra, P. J. (2019). Rethinking the native range concept. Conservation Biology, 34, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13406
- Phelan, M. (2018). The menace of eco-fascism. The New York Review of Books, 22 October.
- Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G. L., Williamson, M., & Kirschner, J. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135498
- Ratzel, F. (2018). Lebensraum: A biogeographical study [1901]. Journal of Historical Geography, 61, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2018.03.001
- Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
- Rosenzweig, M. L. (2001). The four questions: What does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 361–367.
- Smith, A. D. (1998). Nationalism and modernism. London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203167960 Google Scholar
- Smith, N. (2011). Blood and soil: Nature, native and nation in the Australian imaginary. Journal of Australian Studies, 35, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2010.541475
- Smout, T.C. (2003). The alien species in 20th-century Britain. Landscape Research, 28, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390306527
10.1080/01426390306527 Google Scholar
- Spektorowski, A. (2000). The French new right: Differentialism and the idea of ethnophilian exclusionism. Polity, 33, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235491
- Subramaniam, B. (2001). The aliens have landed! Reflections on the rhetoric of biological invasions. Meridians, 2, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1215/15366936-2.1.26
10.1215/15366936-2.1.26 Google Scholar
- Tolia-Kelly, D.P. (2007). Organic cosmopolitanism: Challenging cultures of the non-native at the Burnley Millennium arboretum. Garden History, 172–184.
- Trigger, D., Mulcock, J., Gaynor, A., & Toussaint, Y. (2008). Ecological restoration, cultural preferences and the negotiation of ‘nativeness’ in Australia. Geoforum, 39, 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.010
- Uekötter, F. (2006). The green and the brown. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511617485 Google Scholar
- Warren, C. R. (2007). Perspectives on the 'alien' versus 'native' species debate: A critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507079499
- Warren, C. R. (2018). Alien and native Species. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0535.pub2 Google Scholar
- Watson, H. C. (1847). Cybele Britannica (Vol. 1). London, UK: Longman.
- Wigger, I. (2019). Anti-Muslim racism and the racialisation of sexual violence. Culture and Religion, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2019.1658609
- Wolschke-Bulmahn, J., & Groening, G. (1992). The ideology of the nature garden. The Journal of Garden History, 12, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445170.1992.10410571
10.1080/01445170.1992.10410571 Google Scholar
- Wolschke-Bulmahn, J., & Gröning, G. (2002). The National Socialist Garden and Landscape Ideal: Bodenständigkeit (Rootedness in the Soil). In R. Etling (Ed.), Art, Culture, and Media under the Third Reich (pp. 73–97). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Zimmerman, M. E. (2004). Ecofascism. Retrieved from http://faculty.fgcu.edu/twimberley/EnviroPhilo/Ecofascism.pdf